Why am I covering 3 Elixir topics at once? Well, perhaps it is to show you how the three are used together.
Individually, any of these 3 are interesting, but combined, they provide you with a means of essentially getting rid of conditionals and spaghetti logic.
Consider the following function.
Yeah, it basically works, but there is a big old case statement in there. If you wanted to do something more as well depending on the person, you could easily end up with some spaghetti logic. Let's see how we can simplify this a little.
First thing we did was destructuring. We took the person map and took out the first_name. Not so much of a big deal at first, but this allows us to do something really neat in the next instance.
But first I will digress. In Elixir, you can actually define a function multiple times with the same name. It can use the arity (number of arguments) to determine which function to run. For example:
When you call full_name("John", "Smith") the first function will run and you get "John Smith". When you call full_name("John", "Edgar", "Smith") the second function will run and you will get "John Edgar Smith".
However, more than that, you can combine function overloading with pattern matching. This gives you some more options. Let's combine these features into our example.
The other advantage is that this can provide more robust error handling. Let's say the map you are passing in does not even have a first_name. In the first version of the code, this would give you an error. You can now add another function handler at the bottom.
The other thing we get from destructuring is it helps us deal with highly nested data structures. Let's say that a Person, on top of having a first and last name, has an address (which may or may not be null) and that address has a street which you want to use in the greeting.
e.g.
The above code will work, but is a little messy and hard to read. Not only that but person.address.street breaks the Law of Demeter
Consider instead the following
If you come from Ruby, the above code might seem a little backwards at first. I admit that I sometimes still write my functions initially by passing in the whole map and I tend to destructure once I have worked out the logic inside. Always remember that the first time you write a function is not necessarily how it will look in the end though and I always look for pattern matching and destructuring opportunities in code I have already written.
Individually, any of these 3 are interesting, but combined, they provide you with a means of essentially getting rid of conditionals and spaghetti logic.
Consider the following function.
def greet_beatle(person) do
case person.first_name do
"John" -> "Hello John."
"Paul" -> "Good day Paul."
"George" -> "Georgie boy, how you doing?"
"Ringo" -> "What a drummer!"
_-> "You are not a Beatle, #{person.first_name}"
end
end
Yeah, it basically works, but there is a big old case statement in there. If you wanted to do something more as well depending on the person, you could easily end up with some spaghetti logic. Let's see how we can simplify this a little.
def greet_beatle(%{first_name: first_name}) do
case first_name do
"John" -> "Hello John."
"Paul" -> "Good day Paul."
"George" -> "Georgie boy, how you doing?"
"Ringo" -> "What a drummer!"
_-> "You are not a Beatle, #{first_name}"
end
end
First thing we did was destructuring. We took the person map and took out the first_name. Not so much of a big deal at first, but this allows us to do something really neat in the next instance.
But first I will digress. In Elixir, you can actually define a function multiple times with the same name. It can use the arity (number of arguments) to determine which function to run. For example:
def full_name(first_name, last_name) do
"#{first_name} #{last_name}"
end
def full_name(first_name, middle_name, last_name) do
"#{first_name} #{middle_name} #{last_name}"
end
When you call full_name("John", "Smith") the first function will run and you get "John Smith". When you call full_name("John", "Edgar", "Smith") the second function will run and you will get "John Edgar Smith".
However, more than that, you can combine function overloading with pattern matching. This gives you some more options. Let's combine these features into our example.
def greet_beatle(%{first_name: "John"}) do
"Hello John."
end
def greet_beatle(%{first_name: "Paul"}) do
"Good day Paul."
end
def greet_beatle(%{first_name: "George"}) do
"Georgie boy, how you doing?"
end
def greet_beatle(%{first_name: "Ringo"}) do
"What a drummer!"
end
def greet_beatle(%{first_name: first_name}) do
"You are not a Beatle, #{first_name}"
end
So as you can see, we can completely eliminate our case statement from earlier (and case is basically a conditional). This allows us to have a flatter hierarchy and makes the code easier to read.The other advantage is that this can provide more robust error handling. Let's say the map you are passing in does not even have a first_name. In the first version of the code, this would give you an error. You can now add another function handler at the bottom.
def greet_beatle(_) do
"I'm sorry, I did not get your name"
end
We will first run through the first 5 definitions which pattern match on the first_name attribute. If there is no first_name attribute, then we will move to the next definition. In this case I used the _ which is a pattern matching catch all.The other thing we get from destructuring is it helps us deal with highly nested data structures. Let's say that a Person, on top of having a first and last name, has an address (which may or may not be null) and that address has a street which you want to use in the greeting.
e.g.
def greet(person) do
case person.address do
nil -> "Hello #{person.first_name}"
address -> "Hello #{person.first_name} from #{person.address.street} street."
end
end
The above code will work, but is a little messy and hard to read. Not only that but person.address.street breaks the Law of Demeter
Consider instead the following
def greet(%{first_name: first_name, address: %{street: street}}) do
"Hello #{first_name} from #{street} street."
end
def greet(%{first_name: first_name}) do
"Hello #{first_name}"
end
Destructuring and pattern matching helps us with the law of Demeter and also makes the code flatter.If you come from Ruby, the above code might seem a little backwards at first. I admit that I sometimes still write my functions initially by passing in the whole map and I tend to destructure once I have worked out the logic inside. Always remember that the first time you write a function is not necessarily how it will look in the end though and I always look for pattern matching and destructuring opportunities in code I have already written.
Comments