Skip to main content

Reading AJAX XHR File Uploads in Sinatra

So in my last post I talked about Drag and Drop file uploading with qq.FileUploader (http://valums.com/ajax-upload/).

Anyways, I discovered that qq.FileUploader uses AJAX/XHR to post the file uploads. What I also discovered is that these file uploads need to be handled in a separate manner from a regular file upload form post.

A normal form post (when File upload XHR requests are not available on the client like in Internet Explorer) passes in the following parameters


params: {"qqfile"=>{:type=>"image/png", :head=>"Content-Disposition: form-data; name=\"qqfile\"; filename=\"bb2.png\"\r\nContent-Type: image/png\r\n", :tempfile=>#, :name=>"qqfile", :filename=>"bb2.png"}, "upload_type"=>"rec", "id"=>"24db8cab-285a-abcb-cb47-4daceee977ca"}

Sinatra then reads the :tempfile and :filename parameters to write the file to the server


name = params[:qqfile][:filename]

# create the file path
path = File.join(directory, name)
# write the file
File.open(path, "wb") { |f| f.write(params[:qqfile][:tempfile].read) }


However, if you use a browser that supports XHR uploads, the parameters look a little different


params: {"qqfile"=>"device1.jpg", "upload_type"=>"invoice", "id"=>"24db8cab-285a-abcb-cb47-4daceee977ca"}

So this had me stumped. There was an article I found on the internets (http://onehub.com/blog/posts/designing-an-html5-drag-drop-file-uploader-using-sinatra-and-jquery-part-1/) which talked extensively on how to do the JavaScript side but then at the bottom conveniently left out how to handle the server side (saying it was easy to work out). Well, it wasn't! So that's why I am writing this post

In any case, I won't keep you in suspense any longer...


name = env['HTTP_X_FILENAME']

string_io = request.body # will return a StringIO

data_bytes = string_io.read # read the stream as bytes

# create the file path
path = File.join(directory, name)

# Write it to disk...
File.open(path, 'w') {|f| f.write(data_bytes) }


The final part is that qq.FileUploader does not give you the option to specify which action to post to depending on the type of upload (XHR vs normal) so I had to put in a fork in the server code to figure out how to handle the request. I am basically checking to see if qqfile is of type String, in which case I handle it as an XHR upload, otherwise I handle it as a normal file upload.


# if qqfile is a string, we are using XHR upload, else use regular upload
if params[:qqfile].class == String
name = params[:qqfile]

string_io = request.body # will return a StringIO

data_bytes = string_io.read # read the stream as bytes

# create the file path
path = File.join(directory, name)

# Write it to disk...
File.open(path, 'w') {|f| f.write(data_bytes) }
else #regular file upload
name = params[:qqfile][:filename]

# create the file path
path = File.join(directory, name)
# write the file
File.open(path, "wb") { |f| f.write(params[:qqfile][:tempfile].read) }
end


I haven't tried it in Rails yet, but I am sure it will be similar. I hope this helps...

Comments

Ted said…
Hi, I'm new on Sinatra and Ruby and I don't understand how to use your tutorial. which method? post? put? Can you show your ".rb" complete file?
Ted said…
From my webkit console

"Request URL:http://MYURL/upload?qqfile=file.jpg
Request method:POST
Status:500 Internal Server Error
Intestazioni di richiesta
Content-Length:52446
Content-Type:application/octet-stream
Origin: http://MYURL
Referer:http://MYURL/upload
User-Agent:Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_7; it-it) AppleWebKit/533.21.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.5 Safari/533.21.1
X-File-Name:file.jpg
X-Requested-With:XMLHttpRequest"
entropie said…
Thanks a lot, that request.body was what i missed. Works also for any rack apps like ramaze.

Popular posts from this blog

Master of my domain

Hi All, I just got myself a new domain ( http://www.skuunk.com ). The reason is that Blogspot.com is offering cheap domain via GoDaddy.com and I thought after having this nickname for nigh on 10 years it was time to buy the domain before someone else did (also I read somewhere that using blogspot.com in your domain is the equivalent of an aol.com or hotmail.com email address...shudder...). Of course I forgot that I would have to re-register my blog everywhere (which is taking ages) not to mention set up all my stats stuff again. *sigh*. It's a blogger's life... In any case, don't forget to bookmark the new address and to vote me up on Technorati !

Freezing Gems

What is a gem and why would you want to freeze it? In Ruby, there are times when you want to access pieces of functionality that other people of written (3rd party libraries) and you normally have 2 options. You can install a plug in or install a gem. Normally the method you use is determined by which ever is made available by the author. Gems are installed on the host machine and are pretty handy when you want to run things in the command line or else across lots of projects, but their downside is that if you use a gem in a Rails project there is no automatic publishing mechanism when you deploy your site. You will need to log onto the remote host machine and install the gem manually. Plugins are specific to Rails and are similar to gems in that they are also 3rd party libraries. However they are associated with your Rails project as opposed to your machine so they will get posted to the server on a regular deploy. Freezing a gem is the process of transforming a gem into a plug in. Es...

Responsive Web Design

I wanted to go over Responsive Web Design using CSS. In the old days of web development, we had to code to common screen sizes (i.e. 800 X 600, 1024 X 768) and we patiently waited for people to upgrade their computers to have a decent amount of screen real estate so we could design things the way we really wanted. We also took on semi stretchy web layouts etc to expand and contract appropriately. Then about 2 or 3 years ago, Apple released this little device called an iPhone with a 320 X 480 resolution which took the world by storm and suddenly a lot of people were viewing your website on a tiny screen again... Anyways, as it can be difficult to design a site which looks good on 320 X 480 AND 1680 X 1050, we need to come up with some kind of solution. One way is to sniff the client and then use an appropriate stylesheet, but then you are mixing CSS with either JavaScript or server side programming and also potentially maintaining a list of appropriate clients and stylesheets. Also, you...